Clinton was trying to argue that the aforementioned B.S. “bipartisan” gibberish that Trump opposed could’ve helped prevent this, which is obviously nonsense. The bill in question was shot down months *after* the murder of Riley.
The man accused of murdering Laken Riley, Jose Ibarra, entered the U.S. illegally through El Paso, Texas, in September 2022, and was released back into the interior by the Biden-Harris admin’s immigration authorities due to a lack of space caused by their border crisis. He was later arrested in New York City in August 2023 before being released and then fleeing to Georgia. He then robbed a Walmart in September, also without consequence.
So to recap, Ibarra entered the U.S., was released by the Biden-Harris admin, was arrested in a sanctuary city (and then released), and then fled to another state, where he remained in the country after being arrested for theft. And we’re supposed to believe that the umpteenth “bipartisan border bill” we’ve seen in recent decades was going to stop that? None of those arrests counted as “vetting”?
Read Full Article Here